Don't call it 'gangstalking'

They have reclaimed the term and it doesn't help you

On the internet, TIs have long used ‘gangstalking’ to refer to a collection of phenomena including being followed by people in cars and on foot, being ‘brighted’, having your devices hacked, facing home invasion, rumour campaigns, ‘street theatre’, directed energy weapons and other attempts to harm.

But, the term gangstalkers is also the one my perpetrators use to describe themselves.

As we know, perps are no better than pedophiles and terrorists. And, being the narcissistic kind, they are aware of this. They think that calling themselves gangstalkers makes them sound fearsome. They think of themselves as diligent agents pursuing threats to society. They have a psychotic cop fetish, that is.

When I feed their illogic back to them, reminding them that they are the criminal/terrorist threat and that I am innocent, they protest that they are merely ‘on a contract’. They are just following orders. Hmmm. Where have we heard that before?

Make no mistake. The term gangstalking is part of the psy-ops that serves their needs. It does not serve the needs of innocent TIs and we should not be using it. I don’t know if it originated from the perps, but they certainly have taken it and their online stooges have helped conflate being a TI with the illusion of being oppressed by everybody from your mailman to your mechanic to your boss to your aunt to rotating rosters of randoms in the street.

This is a doubly useful conflation because it presents TIs as suffering classic discrediting symptoms of mental illness (paranoia) and it builds debilitating fear and suspicion in the TI by putting them on the lookout for who is against them. Those behind the neuroweapons program would love nothing more than TIs to be discredited as mentally ill. It is a key aim of the psy-ops. Many do become diagnosed, sectioned, discredited. Erroneously. Which may have consequences for them later in life.

There probably is organised stalking by people in cars and on foot. But most of what the nefarious agencies are doing is far more sophisticated. The physically proximate stalking is designed to intimidate and arouse, and possibly brain-map in the early phases, so that bioelectromagnetic hacking and influence can occur.

The single best thing targeted individuals can do is ignore the harassment. This is advice universally given by everybody smart and knowledgeable about the TI experience. It is also the right advice for dealing with physically proximate narcissists.

But avoiding using the term gangstalking is also the right advice. It has ceased to be meaningful when you have to disassociate it with what it has become conflated with.

What has worked for me is to remember that you are experiencing a tiny but well-targeted signal, no bigger than a distant transistor radio signal. You may be experiencing some nervous-system generated discomfort as a natural side-effect. But you are not being systematically undermined by those close to you or neighbours or random people in the street.

Whenever you think you are, remember these two facts:

1. The system is being tested to be automatic and not people-reliant. Many TIs are aware that the testing process is based on creating the most efficient harm possible. Automation and non-human involvement is crucial here. To bring somebody to ruin via electronic and mechanical means from a secret bunker is what they are aiming at.

2. Every person that is brought into the supposed ‘gang’ of stalking is a potential source of a devastating leak. The main strength the perpetrators have is that we have no concrete evidence. This is blown out of the water as soon as a credible source turns on the system. They don’t employ random people on the street or your neighbours.

We are being stalked, and we are being experimented on, and some of us are being tortured. But we are not being gang-stalked because the meaning of that word has been turned over to the perps, so let’s stop using the term.